Build a leave-of-absence compliance agent
Build a Copilot Studio agent that verifies leave requests against policy and flags anything that needs legal or HR review before it's approved.
Build a governance agent that handles new SharePoint site requests and checks them against policy without a manual admin ticket.
Faster turnaround on new site requests without loosening governance standards.
Convert your governance standard into rules specific enough to check programmatically.
A naming pattern expressed as something close to a regex (e.g., ^[A-Za-z0-9]+-(Internal|External)$), the default sharing setting as an explicit allow/deny, the required sensitivity label by name, and the minimum owner count — rather than leaving any of it as "an admin would know if this looks wrong."
In Copilot Studio, have the agent take a new site request's details and check them against the policy rules, provisioning the site automatically when everything passes and flagging the specific rule that failed when it doesn't.
Prompt idea:
A new site request comes in named "ProjectX-External" requesting external sharing enabled. Check this against our naming convention and default sharing policy, and either provision it or state exactly which rule it violates.
Route failed requests to a dedicated admin queue (a SharePoint list or Planner bucket, not a shared inbox) with the specific rule violated and the requester's original input attached, so the admin can approve a documented exception or ask the requester to fix it, instead of starting from a generic "needs review" with no context.
Write every decision — auto-approved, auto-rejected, or manually overridden — to a SharePoint list with the timestamp, the rule evaluated, and (for overrides) who approved it and why. Treat this list as permanent; it's the first thing a compliance review or a "why does this site exist" question will ask for.
Inspired by: Microsoft devblogs, 2026.
New site requests provisioned automatically when they meet policy, and flagged with a specific reason when they don't.
Every rule in step 1 is a fixed, checkable condition — a naming pattern, a sharing toggle, a required label. That's exactly what Power Automate's condition branches already evaluate; no AI judgment is actually required.
Non-AI alternative: A Power Automate flow with condition branches (regex on the name, explicit sharing/label checks) handles the same pass/fail logic deterministically, routing only real exceptions to an admin.
Build a Copilot Studio agent that verifies leave requests against policy and flags anything that needs legal or HR review before it's approved.
Combine a Copilot Studio agent with deterministic Power Automate steps to extract, classify, and validate contract terms across a batch of documents.
Get practical help with AI consulting or ask about training courses for your team.